+ Reply to Topic
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Topic: Liverpool Waters project would damage city: Unesco

  1. #1
    tuggy, warminster's Avatar
     tuggy, warminster is offline Warrant Officer Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,668

    Liverpool Waters project would damage city: Unesco

    A report into the impact of a proposed building project on Liverpool's historic waterfront said it would leave the area "irreversibly damaged".

    Unesco inspectors visited the city in November to investigate the impact of the Liverpool Waters development on its world heritage site.

    Their report said the scheme would cause a "serious loss of historical authenticity".
    Council leader Joe Anderson said the scheme was "vital to our prosperity".
    The visit by Unesco considered the plans submitted by Peel Holdings for the £5.5bn Liverpool Waters - which includes offices, shops and restaurants - and the management of the city's Maritime Mercantile City world heritage site.

    The site includes much of the city's famous waterfront, including the Three Graces - the Royal Liver Building, the Cunard Building and the Port of Liverpool Building - the Pier Head, the Albert Dock and the Stanley Dock Conservation Area.

    'Disappearing views'
    The report said that while the scheme had yet to be "properly designed", it would cause "a serious deterioration of [Liverpool's] architectural and town-planning coherence, a serious loss of historical authenticity and an important loss of cultural significance".

    “Start Quote
    The plans are vital for the future of what is one the poorest parts of the country”
    End Quote Joe Anderson Liverpool City Council leader

    It added that a Peel Holdings report into the development had also indicated that "several key views from the north will be blocked by the new developments, while also the hard-won views of the Three Graces from Kings Dock will disappear against a backdrop of supertowers".

    The report concluded by saying that Unesco "strongly recommends that the three principal stakeholders - Liverpool City Council, Peel Holdings and English Heritage - reconvene and work out an adjusted scheme".
    It said that while the UN cultural body was "fully supportive of the regeneration efforts undertaken by the city council, it will not support the Liverpool Waters scheme in its current outline, as it will be developed at the expense of the city's heritage and its outstanding universal value".

    Mr Anderson, the leader of the city council, said he had "always believed there is a way forward which will allow us to redevelop the North Liverpool Docks and secure the massive investment and badly-needed new jobs, and to also preserve our World Heritage status".

    The waterfront saw the opening of a new Museum of Liverpool in 2011
    "Peel have already made significant alterations to their proposals since drawing up the original plans," he said.

    "The plans are vital for the future of what is one the poorest parts of the country and the investment is vital to our city's future prosperity.
    "However, we are mindful ofhistoric buildings," she said
    the need to build a better future for our city in a careful and sensitive way."

    A spokeswoman for English Heritage said that as a "statutory advisor to Liverpool City Council", the charity would be willing to reconvene "if invited".
    "We believe that a revised scheme for the central docks could reduce the amount of harm to the site and deliver long-term benefits, which include jobs and growth but also the repair and re-use of.

    From BBC News - Liverpool Waters project would damage city: Unesco

    Last edited by tuggy, warminster; 24th January 2012 at 06:28 PM.
    ]

  2. #2
     A Vast Behind, THATCHAM-SUR-MER is offline Leading Seaman Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    578
    Images
    3
    Are we really going to allow UNESCO to dictate to us what we can or cant do in "our" country? We already have the less than useful EU doing this already.


  3. #3
     Bill Bradbury, Billinge,Nr.Wigan is offline Able Seaman Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    118
    Quote QUOTE: View Post
    Are we really going to allow UNESCO to dictate to us what we can or cant do in "our" country? We already have the less than useful EU doing this already.
    Unfortunately as I am a great supporter of the development of this area mainly for cruise-line purposes, with Peel Holdings the main player, UNESCO are quite right as what I have seen of the high-rise development along that waterfront would seriously detract from the 3 Graces.
    It would be like NY building (if they could) all around the Statue of Liberty or similar develpment along Venice's waterfront. It is a definite "think again" scenario which The Council are advocating. Peel could place much of their "high-rise" stuff on the Wirral side of the Mersey which is also up for development.
    However a cruise terminal is a priority. For Daily Cruise-ship visits Liverpool is the only City that has so many attractions within WALKING distance from the berth, the Museum, Tate and Albert Dock being three.


+ Reply to Topic

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new topics
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts